Michael, a recruiter asks: What is your view on video resumes? We might implement this on our site in the near future. Seems to be a nifty way to get a feel for a candidate. Also a way for candidates to showcase their people skills in a relaxed environment.
In answer:
Putting aside the legal exclusion issues, I think a simple focus on the human and process element is a better focus to answer this question. For instance:
- Do all your candidates look like super models, or Brad Pitt replica's?
- Do they all look good on a camera lens? There is a difference....
- Do they know how to perform on video, which picks up and magnifies the smallest issues? You may not have noticed that twitch until now...
- Are they being interviewed by Katie Curic/David Frost, and can your chosen interviewer build up on screen rapport with all candidates? Even Sir David can't do that...
- Are they being shot by "the next Steven Speilberg?"
- Are you using edited or unedited versions?
All of this, even if the boxes are ticked, means that the candidates generally become more nervous (what "relaxed environment" - ?), and doing a video resume takes some pre-planning: its not just turn up and go.
If you also think about the process, then I think the video resume as the first stop/replacement of the traditional piece of paper falls down in non-entertainment/arts based vocations. The first question any client has is: does the candidate have the basic skills? That can be answered in less than a page of A4 and hence read twice in 1min or less; where as dragging through a 20min video resume multiplies the process by at least 20fold - time is money.
Is there a role for the video resume? Yes, in entertainment and arts fields, as it has always been. Is there a role for the video resume in the wider recruitment world? Possibly in some fields, where the pre-planning costs and training of the candidate can be consumed in the eventual recruitment fee's generated. It can become a second-check savings tool where the basic skills check on paper can be further developed into a character-fit check on video, before the candidate is physically met and interviewed.
But as a generic recruitment tool? I have always thought of YouTube as an alternate entertainment channel, not really a recruiting world benchmark - as this example by Aleksey Vayner shows. If you watch most of the so called video resumes over there, I am not sure much as though there are some great candidates that you would because of their performances employ many of them.
Good Luck!
